this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
506 points (89.8% liked)

Memes

45665 readers
1154 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Just out of curiosity, would you describe the Stalinist USSR as a communist society?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

No. If you knew how ridiculous that statement was, I don't think you would have said it. The USSR was never a communist society. Do we change between direct democracy and a democratic republic depending on which party is elected in the US?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Never? Even when they tried to get rid of the ruble, implementing their strides system instead, that tried to measure work based on the average exertion it required?

This occured before Stalin, under Lenin. It lasted about 20 years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

you are in over your head if you think replacing a currency with a different currency pegged to the value of labor is communist. Socialist, maybe, communist, not even a little.

This document is very dated and fairly simplistic but it's a good 101 basis for what we believe. Just so we're speaking eye to eye, go read this (it's very short and light reading, don't worry), then come back, and use this definition of communism. It's the definition that communists actually use and it'll do you well to know your enemy before you pick fights with them.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm jk the Manifesto is more relevant here, a little less short and substantially more dense but if you're gonna argue with Marxists about Marxism you should probably read the 23 page pamphlet that Marx is actually famous for https://www.marxists.org/admin/books/manifesto/Manifesto.pdf

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would argue that the attempt to abolish money and replace it with a measure of value that was neither arbitrary nor pegged to a commodity like gold was very much a move to liberate the proletariat.

I picked it because the abolition of money has a great deal of symbolic value, that's all. We could use them getting rid of factory owners and seizing industry instead if you wish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's still money. It's just pegged to something besides a bar of gold.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, true. A step in that direction perhaps, but not the actual result yet. Alright, fair point.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)