Here is a non video version of the story:
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
165 points (98.2% liked)
BrainWorms
1219 readers
17 users here now
Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.
This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Thank you so much. I cannot stress how much I prefer a written article.
"outlawing “discriminatory abortions” or “prohibiting physicians from performing an abortion when a physician knows the purpose is based on genetic abnormality"
This part is bullshit.
You missed this one “forbidding anyone who is not a licensed physician from performing an abortion,”
Which, to my understanding, would include plan b. You can't give yourself an abortion.
You're right. I did not read it that way at first but I can totally see people interpreting the law this way. What a shit law.
It sure is nice of them to campaign on behalf of the opposing party which has always struggled in the messaging department.
ignorant fucking fascists
Changes narrative – Republicans have a plan! And it’s much more reasonable than the AAA Initiative
Sounds like the republican plan is to take credit fro the AAA plan that they are actively fighting against. Because Lords knows they aren't going to go more then 15 weeks. They aren't going to sound "reasonable" when they are actively being inflexible.
Plan A could potentially pull votes from AAA Initiative
If Republicans didn't act like lunatics when Roe v. Wade was pulled to states rights, then put women through 2 years of this crap, people might have been a bit more trusting.
Puts Democrats in a defensive position to argue against partial birth abortions, discriminatory abortions, and other basic protections
Democrats won't argue on that front, because they already are winning on the "Republicans took away abortion rights" and that argument is winning them elections. This tactic will just put them on the defense twice.