this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
60 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

34438 readers
170 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Webp is pretty good actually, not their fault many apps don't support it.

Would be even nicer if we can get JPEG XL off the ground though

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If Google didn't remove it from their browser... Not sure in how much time, if ever, jpeg xl would become popular.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

They're thinking about bringing it back after Apple said they'll support it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Really? What does it add that isn’t already done better by other formats? WebP is just Google having not-invented-here syndrome.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If memory serves, one of the main selling point that was presented was that WebP was able to compress an image better while retaining more visually relevant information than JPEG.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

It has better compression than libjpeg, but that's not due to the file format. There are other JPEG libraries that give similar or slightly better results than libwebp.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Just one thing is the ability to show animated images without being absolutely shit, like gifs.

Gifs animations have next to non optimisation and each frame is just another full image. And their colour is very bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

png fully supports animations (great for short animations but as it's not a video format file size explodes exponentially as you make animations longer and the resolution larger. it's good enough as a replacement for typical jifs tho)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why not just use a video file?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

You could do that and some websites use mp4s instead of gifs. I believe imgur calls their peudo gifs "gifv" which is actually an mp4 (or maybe webm/p) with a bit of trickery.

The problem with using mp4s is that they don't normally loop like you would expect a gif to do.

They also get a playback bar and such by default, many browsers also block auto playback of videos.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago

The webp format can go to the depths of hell!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah this sucks - log4j round 2.

Not enough of my EUC team are taking it seriously unfortunately