this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
1304 points (97.5% liked)

Political Memes

5230 readers
2021 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 218 points 5 days ago (18 children)

Why not have more severe consequences for voter suppression?

[–] [email protected] 180 points 5 days ago (13 children)

Because that would lead to fair elections. And if elections were fair republicans would never win any. So they block any attempt to fix elections.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (12 children)

Because that would lead to fair elections. And if elections were fair republicans would never win any.

Why would Democrats not simply extend and expand the Voting Rights Act when they have a Congressional majority? Dems had this in 2021 when Biden took office - both branches, plus the White House. They had it back in 2009 as well, when the House had two dozen votes to spare and the Senate enjoyed a 60 vote supermajority.

Why not send down more financial and legal aid, as Howard Dean championed back in 2008 when he was head of the DNC and delivered one of the largest landslide majorities in the party's history? Why not use federal money and manpower to amp up Mississippi state election offices?

Don't Democrats want to win in Mississippi?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Supreme Court has already placed strict limits on federal intervention in state elections. So it probably wouldn’t go anywhere although I would support an attempt at least.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

The issue with (the most important parts of the) voting rights act was that it only applied to states with a history of racism. Expand it to cover all states and in theory the argument of the SC breaks down. Of course, they may well come up with a different line of reasoning, but a Democratic congress should at least try.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)