this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
-31 points (26.2% liked)
World News
32290 readers
809 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Your unsourced claims seem completely legit and have absolutely convinced me...
the source for the claim is in the post
You mean RT? Lol, no...gonna have to do a lot better than that.
Just because you disagree with it doesn't mean the claim was unsourced!
True. It was a lot shorter than typing "This is sourced, but RT is the media arm of the Kremlin and about as reliable as the National Enquirer. And definitely shouldn't be trusted when russia stands to directly gain from painting ukraine as a bunch of terrorists. Especially when a known terrorist group has already said they did it." though. YMMV.
The only sources you would accept are shit from CIA cutouts and pro western media anyway so what is the point?
There isn't. Either most people have bought into a conspiracy theory or you have. It makes communication kind of pointless.
Examining the preponderance of evidence and coming to the most reasonable conclusion isn't a conspiracy theory bud.
When I said "either or", I really meant it.
Not sure, you're the one commenting at me, not the other way around. In any case, I'm out. Best of luck convincing people with RT though.
What? No, the reason RT is bad is because it's specifically Russian government bad. It's like Qatar and Al-Jazeera, but even less distance.
The problem is not that RT is not CIA controlled or that it's not pro western, it's that it's literally one of the parties involved.