5
[ANN] Kamal v1.0.0 - Deploy web apps anywhere
(kamal-deploy.org)
Thanks! So much for my reading skills/attention span π
Which Debian version is it based on?
Something that I'll definitely keep an eye on. Thanks for sharing!
RE Go: Others have already mentioned the right way, thought I'd personally prefer ~/opt/go over what was suggested.
RE Perl: To instruct Perl to install to another directory, for example to ~/opt/perl5, put the following lines somewhere in your bash init files.
export PERL5LIB="$HOME/opt/perl5/lib/perl5${PERL5LIB:+:${PERL5LIB}}"
export PERL_LOCAL_LIB_ROOT="$HOME/opt/perl5${PERL_LOCAL_LIB_ROOT:+:${PERL_LOCAL_LIB_ROOT}}"
export PERL_MB_OPT="--install_base \"$HOME/opt/perl5\""
export PERL_MM_OPT="INSTALL_BASE=$HOME/opt/perl5"
export PATH="$HOME/opt/perl5/bin${PATH:+:${PATH}}"
Though you need to re-install the Perl packages you had previously installed.
This is fantastic! π
I use Perl one-liners for record and text processing a lot and this will be definitely something I will keep coming back to - I've already learned a trick from "Context Matching" (9) π
That sounds a great starting point!
π£Thinking out loud here...
Say, if a crate implements the AutomatedContentFlagger interface it would show up on the admin page as an "Automated Filter" and the admin could dis/enable it on demand. That way we can have more filters than CSAM using the same interface.
That was my case until I discovered that GNU tar has got a pretty decent online manual - it's way better written than the manpage. I rarely forget the options nowadays even though I dont' use tar that frequently.
This is quite intriguing. But DHH has left so many details out (at least in that post) as pointed out by @[email protected] - it makes it difficult to relate to.
On the other hand, like DHH said, one's mileage may vary: it's, in many ways, a case-by-case analysis that companies should do.
I know many businesses shrink the OPs team and hire less experienced OPs people to save $$$. But just to forward those saved $$$ to cloud providers. I can only assume DDH's team is comprised of a bunch of experienced well-payed OPs people who can pull such feats off.
Nonetheless, looking forward to, hopefully, a follow up post that lays out some more details. Pray share if you come across it π
Interesting topic - I've seen it surface up a few times recently.
I've never been a mod anywhere so I can't accurately think what workflows/tools a mod needs to be satisfied w/ their, well, mod'ing.
For the sake of my education at least, can you elaborate what do you consider decent moderation tools/workflows? What gaps do you see between that and Lemmy?
PS: I genuinely want to understand this topic better but your post doesn't provide any details. π
That single line of Lisp is probably (defmacro generate-compiler (...) ...) which GCC folks call every time they decide to implement a new compiler π
57
I am not the author.
https://github.com/galdor/github-license-observer
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/android/addon/github-license-observer/
This is a cool little addon to help you tell, at a glance, if the repository you're browsing on github has an open source license license.
Especially relevant nowadays given the trend to convert previously OS repos to non-OS licenses as a business model (eg Akka or Terraform.)
1
[OPINION] LinkedIn's new content strategy
(lemmy.ml)
Got a notification from LinkedIn saying "You're one of the few experts who have been invited to collaborate on ..." I got curious and opened up the link.
Apparently, now instead of professional writers being paid to pen down their, usually, cohesive & authentic views, LinkedIn is trying out the idea of generating content using an LLM and then asking for free editorial services from users in exchange for "badges" π€― π€¦ββοΈ
This is cheap IMO. Even for LinkedIn.
What's happened to the "content team" at LinkedIn!?
102
[OPINION] Gnome Online Accounts (Google)
(lemmy.ml)
I thought I'd share how happy I've been w/ my Gnome experience these past few years despite the occasionally controversial UI/UX decisions the Gnome folks tend to make.
I use Gnome Online Accounts integration w/ Google (drive, e-mail, calendar & contacts) and it "just works"β’ & it does so quite reliably.
It's so polished & well-integrated in the desktop that I often don't even notice that I'm using in on a daily basis β€οΈ
PS: I'm using Gnome 44.3 on openSUSE Tumbleweed running on an old ThinkPad T530 w/ an nVidia GPU.
4
[ANN] #.mk - A Matrix room dedicated to Make
(lemmy.ml)
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/4079840
"Don't repeat yourself. Make Make make things happen for you!" π
I just created a public room dedicated to all things about Make and Makefiles.
#.mk:matrix.org
or
matrix.to/#/#.mk:matrix.orgHope to see you there.
1
[TIP] Quickly benchmark commands using Perl
(lemmy.ml)
TIL that I can use Perl's Benchmark module to time and compare the performance of different commands in an OS-agnostic way, ie as long as Perl is installed.
For example, to benchmark curl, wget and httpie you could simply run:
$ perl -MBenchmark=:all \
-E '$cmd_wget = sub { system("wget https://google.com > /dev/null 2>&1") };' \
-E '$cmd_curl = sub { system("curl https://google.com > /dev/null 2>&1") };' \
-E '$cmd_httpie = sub { system("https https://google.com > /dev/null 2>&1") };' \
-E '$timeresult = timethese(15, { "wget" => $cmd_wget, "curl" => $cmd_curl, "httpie" => $cmd_httpie });' \
-E 'cmpthese($timeresult)'
which on my old T530 produces:
Benchmark: timing 15 iterations of curl, httpie, wget...
curl: 2 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 0.42 cusr 0.11 csys = 0.53 CPU) @ 28.30/s (n=15)
httpie: 8 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.01 sys + 4.63 cusr 0.79 csys = 5.43 CPU) @ 2.76/s (n=15)
wget: 3 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 0.53 cusr 0.19 csys = 0.72 CPU) @ 20.83/s (n=15)
Rate httpie wget curl
httpie 2.76/s -- -87% -90%
wget 20.8/s 654% -- -26%
curl 28.3/s 925% 36% --
Very handy indeed β€
2
[Q] Reuse last search query
(lemmy.ml)
When you open a new tab, you can instantly start typing and press ENTER which sends your query to the search engine.
However once that's done, there's no easy way to edit the query directly from the URL bar. The URL bar will contain, well, the URL and not the original query anymore.
Is there a way to edit the search query w/o using the search engine's web page or retyping the whole query again? In other words, is there a way to tell Firefox to show me the previous query in the URL bar instead of showing the URL?
I'd like to try to send as many queries as possible to Google directly from Firefox rather than using Google's webpage (more $$$ for Firefox.)
view more: next βΊ
bahmanm
389 post score162 comment score
joined 3 months ago
I didn't like the capitalised names so configured xdg to use all lowercase letters. That's why
~/optfits in pretty nicely.You've got a point re
~/.local/optbut I personally like the idea of having the important bits right in my home dir. Here's my layout (which I'm quite used to now after all these years):where
binis just a bunch of symlinks to frequently used apps fromoptsrcis where i keep clones of repos (but I don't do work insrc)workspaceis a where I do my work on git worktrees (based offsrc)