ExLisper

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

So Israel was monitoring everything happening in Gaza in the name of national security. There was no privacy there. How did it work out for them?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Meh. Other than shutting it down I don't think there's much Meta could do to help teens. The entire model of posting up your fake life online for everyone to see is bad, with or without beauty filters or notifications. Sounds like he objected to some empty initiatives that were more about PR than actually helping anyone.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Ok, changed to 'dupa.8'. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Can someone check if my password is there? It's 'dupa.7'. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what do you use it for? What things do you save there?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WhatsApp original business plan was 'use the app fro free for a year and than pay $1 per year'. I wouldn't mind paying $1 per year for for an app without adds and respecting my privacy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I think you hugely overestimate the amount of energy used for brooming. It's not like it's a crossfit workout. I don't eat more on the days I clean. My diet with and without a broom will stay the same so brooming is basically free when it comes to energy. People don't use vacuums because they save money on food this way. They use them for their convenience. Vacuums let you save time, not energy. So yes, if you spend the time you save planting trees it's great but we're getting pretty far away from the broom vs. vacuum discussion and we're starting to talk about imaginary people and their imaginary lives.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (15 children)

I think that if we're talking about human slave responsible only for swiping the floors that I feed vegetables and keep alive solely for the purpose of operating the broom you can be right.

If we're taking about the amount of calories I use while swiping and compare it with a robot that someone had to manufacture, transport and than charge using electricity it will be a clear win for the broom. Maybe if the robot lasted 50 years and I controlled my diet to the point that I was able to eat 3% of a carrot daily less because I'm not swiping any more the robot could win but it's an absurd scenario.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It doesn't say 'forever'. It says 'for the rest of their lives' so it depends how much time they have left.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

And it doesn't shit as much.

view more: ‹ prev next ›