this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
663 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

63277 readers
4944 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Update: After this article was published, Bluesky restored Kabas' post and told 404 Media the following: "This was a case of our moderators applying the policy for non-consensual AI content strictly. After re-evaluating the newsworthy context, the moderation team is reinstating those posts."

Bluesky deleted a viral, AI-generated protest video in which Donald Trump is sucking on Elon Musk’s toes because its moderators said it was “non-consensual explicit material.” The video was broadcast on televisions inside the office Housing and Urban Development earlier this week, and quickly went viral on Bluesky and Twitter.

Independent journalist Marisa Kabas obtained a video from a government employee and posted it on Bluesky, where it went viral. Tuesday night, Bluesky moderators deleted the video because they said it was “non-consensual explicit material.”

Other Bluesky users said that versions of the video they uploaded were also deleted, though it is still possible to find the video on the platform.

Technically speaking, the AI video of Trump sucking Musk’s toes, which had the words “LONG LIVE THE REAL KING” shown on top of it, is a nonconsensual AI-generated video, because Trump and Musk did not agree to it. But social media platform content moderation policies have always had carve outs that allow for the criticism of powerful people, especially the world’s richest man and the literal president of the United States.

For example, we once obtained Facebook’s internal rules about sexual content for content moderators, which included broad carveouts to allow for sexual content that criticized public figures and politicians. The First Amendment, which does not apply to social media companies but is relevant considering that Bluesky told Kabas she could not use the platform to “break the law,” has essentially unlimited protection for criticizing public figures in the way this video is doing.

Content moderation has been one of Bluesky’s growing pains over the last few months. The platform has millions of users but only a few dozen employees, meaning that perfect content moderation is impossible, and a lot of it necessarily needs to be automated. This is going to lead to mistakes. But the video Kabas posted was one of the most popular posts on the platform earlier this week and resulted in a national conversation about the protest. Deleting it—whether accidentally or because its moderation rules are so strict as to not allow for this type of reporting on a protest against the President of the United States—is a problem.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

I don’t want to watch this video please

[–] [email protected] 49 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

fwiw they restored the post and blamed it on a moderator being too strict in applying a policy regarding non consensual ai porn. It’s objectively good they have policies banning such things but it was completely obvious from context that this was not meant to be pornographic at all

As such, one could easily read it with cynicism as responding to backlash as they only reviewed said moderators actions after this article came out and the associated clamor

[–] [email protected] 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Poor moderator probably had a foot fetish

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

Or more likely a Trump fetish.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Simple solution to all this crap:

MASTODON.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago (22 children)

I do not understand why people use BlueSky We already had the alternative!!!!! It was here first and many had already created accounts.. Then just went back to Twitter

[–] [email protected] 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
  1. Bluesky is more easily usable
  2. More people they want to follow are on Bluesky

Instead of complaining we need to work on making Masto more welcoming to new users and amplifying the advantages it has over Bluesky

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, that ship has sailed, I think. When Musk first took over Twitter and everyone was bailing, if Mastodon was a viable alternative it could have taken off.

Now that Bluesky has overtaken them, and is seen as the alternative to Twitter, I think the opportunity has been lost.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That's quite a good point. Here's a little thought experiment, though: If we woke up tomorrow and Mastodon looked just like Bluesky (but with a different color scheme) and featured 100% two-way integration with Bluesky...

Essentially, if Mastodon became hands down the most user-friendly and engaging option—would that be enough to make a meaningful difference in its adoption curve?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

Possibly, although anyone who already has an account on Bluesky would likely stay there, and Bluesky has the upper hand in name recognition, and there is the uphill battle of explaining the concept of federation to people who have little interest in technology.

And that's if, hypothetically speaking, Mastodon was as easy to use.

It's not happening. Also, if it's anything like here, the non stop Linuxposting would probably annoy people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Love mastodon but Bluesky has a lot of cool features like starter packs and lists and feeds + the ability to do your own moderation. It’s really customizable that way + there a lot of users… In the end people will go where people are. Besides, mastodon is cool because its still underground and is filled with nerds like the early internet. Do we really want all the normies to join?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Same discussion in every single post on either Mastodon or Bluesky.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Hopefully this amplifies the videos exposure. Is it because it is considered explicit that it's not tolerated like other forms of parody?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

yeah it's basically deepfake porn.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago

It's probably not AI, and could be considered revenge porn.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Re-upload it 100 times over..fuck em

[–] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago

Throw it on peertube/other platforms. haha

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Explicit? Hardly. Just two good pals suckin’ toe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

That's because Aaron Rodericks is Jesse Singal loving garbage.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'd expect a little more enthusiasm from our Commander in Chief...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Once again proving it isn't really decentralised.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

How so? Lemmy is technically decentralized and mods remove stuff here...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

I don't think anyone claims BlueSky is decentralized, just more fair about moderation. I'd probably be fine with using Twitter if Elon Musk hadn't completely corrupted it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago

At least in the US, protest falls under protected speech and has additional legal protections beyond ordinary speech similar to satire. IANAL but this is not a legal matter. It's clearly an internal policy issue.

This is the problem with any social media being centralized.

BlueSky is just as centralized as Twitter or Facebook.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›