this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
1141 points (99.4% liked)

Greentext

5270 readers
2421 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Will porn be the straw that broke the mountain's back?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 19 hours ago

Prohibition but worse

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

MAGA Republicans: will riot if you give them a Facebook event invite

Democrats: let's see, maybe they will riot if you take their houses or something. At least they might write a strongly worded comment

[–] [email protected] 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's because the Republicans usually have the police either directly on their side, or at least sympathetic to them.

Look at the police response across the country to BLM protests a few years ago.

And it's not like left wingers in the country don't do extreme action. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Hill_Occupied_Protest

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Guilty Canadian Admission:

In my teens I lived in Brockville Ontario near Ogdensburg New York and watched a lot of US channels. The Star Spangled Banner came on at the beginning of the broadcast day for some channels.

For many years, I thought the first line was "Jose can you see"

[–] [email protected] 37 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

When I was a kid I thought the "for which it stands" in the national anthem was in reference to a country called "witchistan", which was presumably full of witches.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And ANON doesn’t understand how to use a VPN?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

If they knew that, they wouldn't have made the post

[–] [email protected] 245 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Americans now need a wanking license.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idaho is starting a registry for at-risk men with erections, to prevent impure thoughts. You need to send a picture of your dick, where it will be validated by an evangelical priest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Good boy, you don't come until Trump tells you to.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Trump branded chastity cages.

What I hate most is that that would be an effective tactic for right wing extremist groups. Keeping men sexually frustrated and insecure in their masculinity is a powerful tool for them.

Actually come to think of it, I really wouldn't be surprised if there were a variety of political themed pro dommes these days. It seems like it would be lucrative

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 day ago (6 children)

yew got a lie-sense for that boner?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

That's what you voted for. You want republican rule taking away your freedoms. Well now you Floridains have what you wanted and voted for. Don't be mad you made your bed and dont like the sheets.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 23 hours ago (8 children)

Given how close most elections are and the low turnout, I would say at least 40% of voters and 50% of the population didn't vote for this without even having to look at the election results.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

In fact, 77% of the USA population did not vote for this.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

May he enjoy the sweet freedom of USA!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Make sure you cum on your ID first as tribute.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

That sounds like a chicken and egg problem. How is the cum getting on the ID before accessing the porn? If you use another means, surely you will no longer be in the mood for accessing a porn site...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 day ago (19 children)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

You are free to be as conservative as you want. What more can you ask for?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 21 hours ago

you're free to be as conservative as the heritage foundation wants you to be.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago

Conservatives jerk off to porn all the time. This isn't even strictly conservative per-say, its just generic American prudishness. 30 years ago, you'd have Tipper Gore and Newt Gingrich coming together to restrict the sale of rap music CDs and wrestling themed video games to anyone under the age of 13, on similar grounds.

Demanding everyone have an ID present any time they want to do anything is a throw-back to the 90s liberal fixation on "accountability" that was a proxy for mass surveillance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 141 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is pretense to intrude on other things and more importantly remove the ability to browse pornography anonymously, which is dangerous. I would never use an account to browse a porn site because why would I ever want that data linked back to me? Look at the government right now. You watch a gay or trans porn video and in a few years that could be grounds for never being able to have certain types of jobs or worse, being deemed a “miscreant”

If this was truly about protecting children they would encourage open dialogue on sex in homes and increase inclusive sex education. This is evidence based. It would still be necessary even with this nonsense because obviously vpns exist, as well as amateur run sites, sites run from outside of the USA, torrents, etc that don’t give a shit about us laws requiring age verification and will show all kinds of obscenely hardcore videos

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Lol I saw Lemmings celebrate Australia's Ban of Teenagers from social media, then simultaneously criticize this lol 🤣

(Both are bad, btw)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's uncontroversial to say that porn is bad for children, and I would say that social media is bad for children as well. I think as one matures and becomes an adult both become less bad, less fraught, but the difference between the two of Is that one with one of them you sometimes want to be anonymous, and the other one you almost always want to be anonymous.

I mean I'm against requiring affirmative identity verification online anyway, even as a solution to keeping children away from things that are unhealthy for them. You can't sacrifice the freedom of adults on the altar of protecting children.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›