this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
314 points (89.8% liked)

Political Memes

5483 readers
3305 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (37 children)

(which isn’t wrong but he’s still the best viable option)

Whoa, hey now I very much object to the certainty of this claim.

Yeah, David Axelrod, senior Obama strategist credited with Obama's successful elections, Obama speech-writers and communications director, and now numerous long-serving Congressional democrats disagree but, totally the best viable option despite poll after poll showing he's massively down and Biden's own current campaign strategists reporting they see no viable path.

If your ship hit the iceberg and is taking on water, any other nearby vessel is a better alternative. At worst, it's in the same condition. At best, it's not fucking sinking. 75% of likely voters say Biden is too old to run and Democrats have a better chance with someone else at defeating Trump.

Disclaimer: we need to jump ship now but I'll vote for a corpse over Donald Trump. I just think we'll lose if we stick with Biden and the data shows it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I'm not sure I'd put much stock in modern polling.

A study suggests the debate had very little impact, but even if it didn't, historically, changing candidates this late hasn't worked out.

https://boingboing.net/2024/07/10/impacts-of-the-presidential-debate-far-overestimated.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Discussion aside, wtaf is boingboing.net? I'm even hesitant to click that link.

  • Reliable pollsters are accurate albeit snapshots in time.

  • Aggregate reliable polls even more so.

  • Nate Silver's algorithm is over 90% accurate in its prediction model across thousands of races over the years.

  • Cook Political Report is the gold standard.

  • Even internal polls reported by democratic Congressional campaigns as well as the President's team themselves admit they're behind.

  • They were 10 points up at this time in 2020.

  • If you aren't going off this, what ARE you going off of, vibes? In one breath you say don't put stock in polls, then point to an outlier? I mean, what!?

So you can't comfort me saying that when Biden should've come out 1 step ahead from that debate, he is not maybe only 1 step back as he has been for ages, but possibly 2 steps back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How do you not know boingboing.net?

Anyway, that's not the source, but Rawstory doesn't allow ad-blockers, so I linked that synopsis.

https://www.rawstory.com/rs-exclusive/biden-debate-2668724330/

None of those, including my link, is accurate enough to really matter, especially this far from the election.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. Yeah I genuinely never heard of that site in my life. Seems like it's been around since forever, too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

To be fair, it used to be a much better, more relevant site, which I only remember because I've been around since forever too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)